Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

groundhog daygroundhog day

Punxsutawney Phil 'Indicted' Over Terrible Spring Forecasting

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

The Northeast’s frustration with a lack of spring-like temperatures has turned attention towards the groundhog Punxsutawney Phil and his terrible forecasting.

As many gleefully remember back in early February, Phil did not see his shadow, which supposedly meant we were in for an early spring. With March 20th come and gone – and weeks of 30 degree temperatures still in the forecast, one Ohio prosecutor has officially “indicted” Phil for what he deems a “misrepresentation of spring.”

The tongue-in-cheek, official document by Butler County Prosecutor Mike Gmoser reads:

On or about February 02,2013, at Gobbler’s Knob,Punxsutawney Phil did purposely,and with prior calculation and design, cause the people to believe that Spring would come
early.

Contrary to the Groundhogday report, asnowstorm and record low temperatures have been and are predicted to continue in the near future, which constitutes the offense of MISREPRESENTATION OF EARLY SPRING, a Unclassified Felony, and against the peace and dignity of the State Of Ohio.

Gmoser’s recommendation for punishment? The death penalty.

In defense of the accusations, Phil’s long-time handler John Griffiths told USAToday that the groundhog is not at fault. “Maybe there’s just a dark cloud over Ohio,” he said.

Gmoser’s complaint comes days after the satirical newspaper The Onion published a piece titled  “Punxsutawney Phil Beheaded For Inaccurate Prediction On Annual Groundhog Slaughtering Day.”

“Let this gesture stand as a stark reminder to all future groundhogs who seek to presage winter’s end without evidence or merit,” the article quipped.

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

 

 

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

PIG TRIAL VERDICT: PIGS LOSE, PETA WINS

In short, the lawyers ineptly argued that pigs are not property, and then went on to argue that they are property.

The only label you need on egg cartons: exploitative

We have to recognize that the ‘free range’ campaign (and the many chicken related campaigns like it) is as frivolous as the ‘humane meat’ one.

The True Carnage of the Film “Carnage” – Part 2

It fails as education because whatever useful information it manages to convey, any benefit of this is negated by the confusion it fosters in an arena that is already beset with massive confusion.