Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.


Government May Give Captive Chimps Endangered Status

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

US Fish and Wildlife Service is considering righting a wrong that has been in effect since 1990. While wild chimpanzees have been listed as endangered and given the accompanying protection of that label, captive chimps have only been listed as threatened. In good news for the captive primates, that soon might change. The government organization is now taking public comments as they consider relabeling the captive primates as endangered.

US Fish and Wildlife Service writes on their website, “The rule proposed today would correct this inconsistency after the Service determined that the ESA does not allow for captive-held animals to be assigned a separate legal status from their wild counterparts.”

A 2010 petition from a variety of animal protection groups including The Humane Society of the United States and The Jane Goodall Institute helped to inspire this change of heart. Dr. Jane Goodall said about the potential revision, “I was so pleased to hear about the proposed rule. This is exceptional news for all chimpanzees and for all the petitioners, especially the Humane Society of the United States, who have worked so hard on this issue. This decision gives me hope that we truly have begun to understand that our attitudes toward treatment of our closest living relatives must change. I congratulate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for this very important decision.”

Would life change for captive chimps if this goes through? Thankfully, yes. According to US Fish and Wildlife Service, “If this proposal is finalized, certain activities would require a permit, including import and export of chimpanzees into and out of the United States, “take” (defined by the ESA as harm, harass, kill, injure, etc.) within the United States, and interstate and foreign commerce. Permits would be issued only for scientific purposes or to enhance the propagation or survival of the affected species, including habitat restoration and research on chimpanzees in the wild that contributes to improved management and recovery. The Service will work closely with the National Institutes of Health, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, the biomedical research community, and other affected parties to consider the implications of this proposed rule on their operations.”

If you believe that captive chimps should be given the same protection as wild chimps, get in touch with US Fish and Wildlife Service today.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Like us on Facebook:

Vegans who campaign against fur are upset that Aritzia is using fake fur but real down

You know how we won’t shut up about how ineffective single issue campaigns are, including the ones against fur?


LA schools fuck up, reintroduce flavoured milk as a healthy option

Cafeterias have become pilot programs for whether or not strawberry and chocolate milk is the way to make more money on our youth.


Dallas is afraid of a little vegan brisket

Uh oh Dallas, have you been shown that you don’t need animals to make a mean barbecue?