Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

'Life of Pi' Director, Ang Lee, Responds to Tiger Incident

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

We recently shared a story regarding the near drowning of a tiger on the set of the 2012 film, “Life of Pi.” The information came from an email written by a monitor for the American Humane Association, in which she revealed that a tiger “damn near drowned” and that she “downplayed the f*ck out of it.” The Hollywood Reporter obtained the email and the story has gone viral, alarming and upsetting thousands of people that the “No Animals Harmed” credit in the film was false. Now, the director of the film, Ang Lee, has spoken out about the incident.

Lee stated, “It was an accident. The crew worked hard to rescue the tiger and then showed him a lot of care, giving him five-star treatment. […] We gave a lot of care to the tiger, as much as we possibly could.”

The film primarily used a CGI tiger for the film, but used a live tiger for scenes where they felt the computerized tiger wouldn’t suffice. Unfortunately, their creative eye led them to put a live tiger in danger, and it sounds like Lee “downplayed” the incident, too. The only way to guarantee an animal’s safety in a film is to use computer graphics and take live animals out of the script altogether!

Hopefully this unsettling incident will serve as a wake-up call to Lee, the AHA, and filmmakers everywhere that animals are not here for our entertainment.

Photo credit: cinemafestival / Shutterstock.com

Related on Ecorazzi:

+Animals Were Harmed in the Making of ‘Life of Pi,’ Others

+Darren Aronofsky Says “NOAH” to Live Animals in New Flick

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Veld donates money to farm animals and also serves them

Lest we be confused that their giant V logo stands for anything other than Veld.

Trading beef for beans is not a solution, veganism is

Please do substitute beef for beans, but also have tofu instead of turkey, carrots instead of chicken, and I think you see where I’m going.

Guys, extortion isn’t an effective form of vegan advocacy

Assuming we can extort people into respecting the lives of others makes no sense.