Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Merck & Co. to stop testing on chimpanzeesMerck & Co. to stop testing on chimpanzees

Merck to Stop Chimpanzee Testing for Pharmaceuticals

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

The third largest pharmaceutical company in the world has vowed to stop using chimpanzees as test subjects for its products. Merck & Co joins another two dozen drugmakers opting for more humane testing practices.

“The science has advanced, and we don’t really need it,” said Merck spokeswoman Caroline Lappetito.

Improved technology, animal alternatives and growing pressure from animal rights groups, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Congress are behind the company’s switch.

According to Kathleen Conlee of the Humane Society of the United States, that could mean over 1000 chimpanzees currently warehoused in laboratories and used for research could be “retired” to sanctuaries by 2020.

“It’s been a long road in trying to end the use of chimpanzees in research, and we’re now at a turning point,” said Conlee, who’s been advocating for chimps for seven years, to The Associated Press on Thursday. “We’re going to keep on (advocating) until the chimpanzees in laboratories are all in sanctuaries.”

For now, Conlee is trying to convince hired testing companies to cease housing the primates in labs for future work and to pay for their accommodation at one of the five U.S. accredited sanctuaries for retired research chimpanzees.

If they oblige, that would mean a life of freedom among hundreds of other chimps who, like them, were confined in cages for their entire “working” lives. No doubt, a much awaited improvement.

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Via The Huffington Post Green

Like us on Facebook:
  • Siraganda

    Does this mean they got alternative methods or other animal models? If the first thing is the case it is ok, if it is the second, it is a great deception from the side of the great animal rights organizations, a big step backwords in animal rights endeavours and a speciesistic shot in the back of every upright animal rights fighter!

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.

Wicked Good Opportunity

Bloomberg reports that the introduction of “vegan ranges” is at least partially responsible for improving Tesco’s finances.