Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Senator Ted Cruz posted photo with tiger skin rug and created a whirlwind of harsh criticismSenator Ted Cruz posted photo with tiger skin rug and created a whirlwind of harsh criticism

Senator Ted Cruz Posts Controversial Photo With Tiger Skin Rug

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

This past Wednesday, Republican Senator Ted Cruz posted a photo on his Facebook page which immediately became the target of harsh criticism from Republican and Democratic voters alike. The image showed Cruz, along with another Republican Senator, posing next to what appears to be a tiger skin rug. The photo was posted with the caption “Did a little shopping for the office with United States Senator Mike Lee in Houston today.”

Tigers are currently one of the world’s most threatened animals – topping the list of endangered species due to poaching, demand for illegal tiger goods and loss of natural habitat. According to the World Wildlife Fund, the number of tigers living in the wild has declined by 97% during the last century. Today, only 3,200 known tigers exist outside of captivity.

According to the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, it is illegal to import, buy or sell the pelts (or any other parts) of tigers in the United States. Unfortunately, skins taken from animals killed before the ban are considered exempt and can legally be owned and traded.

Although it may, technically, be legal to own the skin of a tiger that was killed before the ban took place, concerned citizens have pointed out that the Senator’s picture still raises ethical questions.  Although Cruz’s spokesperson claims that the photo was posted as a joke, this poor attempt at humor may encourage others around the world to follow his lead and purchase a skin of their own. A rising demand would not only impact the price of legal skins, but would encourage the illegal hunting of living tigers as poachers seek to turn a larger profit.

Photo Credit: Senator Ted Cruz’s Facebook Page

Related on Ecorazzi

+Leonardo DiCaprio Gives $3M to Help Double Nepal’s Tiger Population

+Nepal Tigers Becoming Nocturnal to Survive Near Humans

+Khloe Kardashian Tweet Raises $6000 For Tigers

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments
  • 1froglegs

    Look how small that thing is. It is a novelty, not a real tiger.

  • Angelique

    It is the symbolism and the principle that counts, not the appearance.

  • Is that pelt legal? Whose is it?

Beyoncé and Jay-Z sell out veganism for ticket giveaway

Veganism deserves better than constantly being considered something to be bribed, dared or loosely entered into.

Month one of “the year of the vegan”

News outlets are abuzz with the promise of new vegan products, celebs, and services and how that is somehow a fresh affirmation that our world is one turn closer to being fully free from animal use.

What About: “No-Kill” Eggs?

The reason for these advancements is not a sense of justice – because that can only mean going vegan – but is primarily driven by economics.

Vegandale Brewery offers the ultimate vegan night out

This brewpub helps veganism shed its stay-home-and-eat-tofu stereotype.

Don’t blame vegans for the shame you feel about using animals

The shame Carly Lewis claims veganism casts over her is more likely the ghosts of moral uncertainty, spectres that are more likely fish than cows, wondering how morality can possibly be used as ammunition in favour of murder.