Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Levi's CEO, Chip Bergh: Unwashed Jeans Are More Sustainable

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Denim jeans were intended to last. Levi Strauss and Jacob Davis invented “blue jeans” in 1873. Once seen as attire for working men, jeans have evolved tremendously and can be tailored to fit any wardrobe or occasion. While the style of blue jeans shows no sign of going away, Chip Bergh, the CEO of Levi’s, has a very sustainable approach to longer lasting jeans: don’t wash them.

Bergh participated in Fortune’s Brainstorm Green conference, where he spoke about eschewing washing machines in favor of extending the life of your beloved blue jeans, but also as a way to help the environment. Bergh says skipping the laundromat saves a lot of water and, with durable jeans that last so long, consumers will save money by choosing Levi’s jeans. In fact, Bergh himself hasn’t washed his favorite pair of jeans in the entire year that he’s had them.

“I know that sounds totally disgusting,” Bergh says to a chuckling audience. “But believe me, it can be done! You can spot clean it, you can air dry it… I have yet to get a skin disease or anything else.” Bergh isn’t alone in the “no wash” movement. Anderson Cooper and Tommy Hilfiger also skip the washer and dryer for their blue jeans.

“We are the ultimate in sustainable apparel,” Bergh said. “If you buy [our jeans] they will last a lot longer than most people’s waistlines will.” With that said, Bergh also mentioned that Levi’s rank #1 in second-hand clothing stores, as well. 

Hear more about Levi’s sustainability practices and goals in Bergh’s interview below.

Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments

Collaborating with animal exploiters won’t help animals

The two sides claim to both have the “health and well-being of animals” in mind in this partnership, but one likely said “after profitability” under their breath.

Exploitation for art is no worse than exploitation for dinner

It always seems to come back to a confused juror deciding when animal use is justified.

Humane Society Serves Pork to Save Dogs…WTF?!

All animals matter morally, equally.