Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

pcrm animal testingpcrm animal testing

WATCH: New Animation Gives Argument Against Animal Testing

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) launched “Tail of Toxics,” a three-minute video that explains how cutting-edge technologies such as robots make animal experimentation unnecessary when testing for consumer products.

According to PCRM, which represents more than 10,000 physicians, testing on robots that utilize human skin cells will lead to more accurate results, and eliminate the need to subject animals to unnecessary and cruel experiments.

“From cleaning products to industrial chemicals to makeup, current safety testing methods put people and the environment at risk,” says toxicology expert Kristie Sullivan, M.P.H., the Physicians Committee’s director of regulatory testing. “But there is a scientific revolution taking place with new tools that will bring major benefits.”

Animals are used to test for the safety of many chemicals found in everyday products, but these tests are unreliable. “We shouldn’t have to wonder whether the chemicals in our homes and the environment are safe,” Sullivan says. “Many aren’t tested adequately because animal tests take too long and don’t reliably reflect human systems. Humans are not 70-kilogram rats, but today we assess chemicals as if we were.”

Aside from the fact that animal testing is an unreliable way to test for toxicity in humans, animals who are used in toxic testing are almost never given any form of pain relief, and experiments are performed while animals are still alive and fully conscious. Studies have shown that animals experience fear, pain, and are capable of feeling empathy towards other animals who are suffering, which makes animal testing a cruel and inhumane way to make sure the next new cosmetic, or cleaning product is safe for humans.

A shift away from animal experimentation took place in March, when United States Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA) introduced the Humane Cosmetics Act, a landmark bill to ban the testing of cosmetics on animals. Also, the unreliability of the results gathered from testing on animals has led experts at the National Academy of Sciences to recommend a complete shift away from animal experimentation.

Please take action against animal testing by signing the petition.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons: courtesy of Janet Stephens

Like us on Facebook:
  • Tara

    This is so important! I hope that more people become aware of the inherent flaws of animal testing. Even beyond the obvious cruelty that animals are subjected to, animal testing delays protections for human health and the environment, and wastes tons of time and money in the process. Thanks for sharing this!!

  • Tobester

    This video is great! The format makes it really accessible for everyone who might be interested. Hopefully people will share and this info can enter the mainstream public consciousness.

  • Theresa

    Uh what are these methods? What papers have stated these even work? To be honest not a fan of animal testing, but as a scientist it needs to be done so we know the side effects the drugs could potentially have. If people are so against it, then please sign yourself up and become a test subject so animals won’t be harmed.

What About Zero Waste?

Going vegan must be at the heart of any environmental discussion.

Why it doesn’t matter if the Impossible burger is healthy

The Impossible burger doesn’t need to be overtly healthy – it just needs to be vegan.

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.