Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

george r r martingeorge r r martin

George R. R. Martin Denies Death to Fan, Donates $10K Instead

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

‘Game of Thrones’ is mostly known for its gruesome violent deaths and battles, but even George R. R. Martin has a soft side.

The bestselling author offered in June a once in a lifetime chance for fans of his book series. If they donated $20,000 to a wolf sanctuary in his hometown of Santa Fe, they would get a character named after them in the series that would suffer a horrid bloody death. Martin couldn’t follow through with his promise when a 13-year-old boy begged him for that miserable death, though.

“A gruesome grizzly death is all I ask for,” wrote Jack B, in a letter he sent to Martin also vouching to donate $260, his pocket money and all he could afford.

Jack also noted wolves are his favorite animals and that he plans on being a wolf conservationist in the future.

“There’s a limit to how many people even I can kill,” said Martin in reply. “It pleases me no end to know that my novels, and the TV series based on them, have inspired readers as young as yourself to rally to the support of these majestic and too often stigmatized animals.”

Martin went ahead and donated $10,000 to the Wild Spirit Wolf Sanctuary instead of granting Jack’s wish.

At least the boy can take comfort in the fact that his letter spared the animals he so loves from suffering unnecessary deaths.

Mashable got a hold of Jack’s entire letter, which can be read below. You can try not to ‘awww’ but you probably won’t be able to.


Via The Dodo

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Like us on Facebook:

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

Why we SHOULDN’T genetically ‘disenhance’ animals

Creating bandaid “solutions” to ethical problems we’ve created doesn’t address the issue at hand

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.