Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

We don’t need non-vegan celebrities telling us how to treat animals

Like us on Facebook:

We vegans are a devoted bunch. We’re quick to whole-heartedly support something we love, and even quicker to jump on something we don’t. So why is that every time I open up Facebook, I’m flooded with notifications from vegan acquaintances sharing the same memes, one-liners, and quotes about animal rights from non-vegan celebrities? Why aren’t we calling them on this bullshit?

I’m sure you’ve experienced a scenario or two like this: twenty or more likes and a handful of positive comments will populate the space below a Ricky Gervais image. On it, a quote reads “wearing cosmetics that were tested on animals makes you ugly on the inside.” Okay, you think while taking it in, it’s true that the cosmetic industry is incredibly exploitative of animals. But at what point do you look at Ricky Gervais, consider what he does to participate in equally immoral activity and think wait a second…

I’ve previously written about my non-vegan friends sharing cute kitten videos and petitions to save the monkeys, but that still makes a bit more sense to me than vegans sharing animals rights advice from people who continue to use them. My non-vegan friends haven’t made the connection…am I to assume my vegan friends haven’t either?

It’s hypocrisy at best, and a disgusting display of moral highways at worst. Why does Ricky Gervais think that women buying makeup that either employs vivisection or the dead parts of animal directly is worse than his own actions, as a man, buying let’s say a steak or a pair of leather loafers (I went full stereotype there). There is obviously absolutely no reason to think one is more frivolous than the other, or that those buying in to one example of the injustices we enact upon animals is someone worse than another. I don’t think the rabbit in the slaughterhouse considers whether or not she’d prefer to be used in a jacket or a side dish. I also don’t think it is anymore morally reprehensible to blindly choose animal un-friendly cosmetics than it is to order a meat and cheese laden entree for dinner.

So we share Leonardo DiCaprio’s speeches about saving the planet, and Oprah’s meatless Monday pledge, and Nikki Reed’s vegan bags. And no mater how much we want to save our planet, encourage our friends to stop eating animals, or want more vegan products to be available, we’ve gone ahead and muddied up the waters by supporting exploiters directly without question. Whether or not it was our intention, we have raised the Ricky Gervais’ of the world up on to a pedestal, and have given them permission to criticize others for not taking the steps they themselves haven’t made. We’ve given them free rein to be the voice of our movement, without ever having participated in it. WHY!?

What if Donald Trump had a brilliant one-liner about ending racism? Would we ignore each and every one of his racist remarks and actions, and share his words as encouragement for others to end their racism? Of course not – we’d tell him to change his own ways. We’d no sooner let someone off the hook for rape because they publicly advocate for consent. Why are celebrities actions less important to the masses than the shareable, highly contrived, one-off blips of fanning interest they give to something (a petition, a fad, a single-issue campaign) in an attempt to remain favourable in the public eye?

Listen Ricky, you may think that by having an audience you need to speak up, but the old adage is true and your actions speak louder than your words. You aren’t morally superior for choosing “humane” meat, for bullying hunters, or for declaring predominantly female products are more cruel than predominantly male ones. If you want to make a difference, and you want to continue being a Twitter-poster-child for calling out the crap involved in animal exploitation, you have to stop being an animal exploiter. It should be really simple because you already feel for some animals. Just add chickens and cows to the list, and go vegan. Then, work on educating others to go vegan and you won’t have to waste anymore time hopping from issue to issue. Until then, it’s you who is “ugly on the inside.”

I hope that I’d be called out criticizing Ricky Gervais for not being vegan if I myself weren’t. I also hope that people don’t believe that a catchy phrase or put-down somehow negates behaviour. It doesn’t help animals and it doesn’t help veganism to have someone speak out without following through with the everyday choices they make.

Like us on Facebook:
0 Comments
  • Delilah

    Do we know for certain that Ricky or the others mentioned are meat eaters?

    • Fangorn

      You mean, do we know they aren’t vegan?
      They have not publicly renounced all use of animals, even as they do heap scorn on specific uses.

      btw, there is a typo in the blog post -> apprehensible.

      • Delilah

        Yes that’s what I meant. There was a similar discussion yesterday on a vegan fb page about Leo DiCaprio.

    • Amanda Spring

      Yes, just google search “Gervais vegan” and you can read all about his favorite kinds of cheese and how he only eats meat that doesn’t resemble the actual animal from which it came.

      • Delilah

        That’s strange and hypocritical. I would understand if it were his goal and he was transitioning to vegan.

  • vegan truth seeker

    I completely agree that it’s hypocritical to fight for some animals and not being vegan.

    However, and again, instead of criticizing and judging ‘part-time animal rights activists’ who are not vegan maybe we should help them realize that all animals deserve to be protected and not just some of them.

    In this case, and if Ricky Gervais isn’t vegan, maybe you should reach out to him and ask him if he would do an interview for Ecorazzi – I’m sure he’d be willing to do it.

    Then, politely, ask him why is it that he fights for some animals and eats others; I believe he had a cat he adored – if he still has that cat you could ask him if he wouldn’t mind if someone came to his place, get his cat and take him/her to be slaughtered the way it’s done with all the animals who are killed for human consumption; he would obviously be outraged with that notion and then you could ask him why is it that his cat deserves to live and be loved and those other animals don’t…

    Maybe, just maybe something inside of him would ‘click’ and he would go vegan.
    That way we would have a famous vegan fighting for animal rights and also convincing numerous people to go vegan.

    Now, wouldn’t that be so much better than criticizing him in an online article?

Meat Is Not the Problem

Meat is not the problem, all animal products are the problem.

There is no going “a little bit vegan,” even if Yale adds more vegan options

A University is going to supply what it’s dollars..er..students demand of them.

Mercy For Animals Opposes And Promotes Animal Exploitation, Somehow.

Someone who actually promotes veganism promotes only veganism.