Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

cosmetic productscosmetic products

China Removes Animal Testing Requirement for Cosmetics

Like us on Facebook:
The current article you are reading does not reflect the views of the current editors and contributors of the new Ecorazzi

Big news from China! The country has effectively removed its requirement for cosmetics to be tested on animals in order to be approved for sale. While that doesn’t mean the end of suffering for lab rats and rabbits everywhere, activists are hopeful it is the start of a new, kinder era.

“It’s a significant departure,” said Troy Seidle, director of research and toxicology for the Humane Society International. “Certainly it’s the first time we’ve seen an animal test requirement being removed from Chinese regulations for cosmetics.”

HSI is one of the major agencies behind the Be Cruelty-Free campaign in China. They have been pushing for the mandated animal testing policy instated in 2012 to be reversed. The requirement forced companies like Avon and Estée Lauder who did not use the cruel methods of research, to start using them in order to still be able to sell to the large Chinese market.

“For decades Estée Lauder enjoyed the support of consumers who believed the company’s ban on animal tests was permanent,” said Kathy Guillermo, senior vice president at People for Ethical Treatment of Animals. “When the company quietly resumed its support for animal tests, it did not bother to inform those consumers.”

As a result, dedicated animal lovers and activists had to do their own research to find out which companies remained cruelty free. Lush, E.L.F. and The Body Shop were some of the ones that opted out of a growing $1.7 billion Chinese market for the cause and spared an estimated 300,000 rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and other critters from being used as test subjects.

Experts are warning, however, that just because the law has changed, that doesn’t mean all brands will immediately stop testing on animals.

“The regulation was written with certain caveats (i.e. other technologies need to be available, etc.),” wrote Erin H. Hill, vice president for program development at the Institute for In Vitro Sciences, in an email. “Since many of these have not been met, it is likely that the C.F.D.A. will continue to conduct their post-market surveillance as they have in the past.”

“You can change the policy but whether the day-to-day testing practice is going to change is still anyone’s guess,” agreed Mr. Seidle. “It is going to be very slow-go for the time being,” and “we can’t expect China to get there overnight. It’s just not reasonable.”

So maybe not overnight, but soon. We’ll take the baby steps towards a cruelty free market.

Via The New York Times

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Like us on Facebook:
  • EDRFTGyhujik

    I still boycott Estee Lauder and Avon and any company that tests on animals. This is good that China is doing this but I will not call them a good country until they stop testing on animals completely and stop torturing Angora rabbits for their fur.

Beyoncé and Jay-Z sell out veganism for ticket giveaway

Veganism deserves better than constantly being considered something to be bribed, dared or loosely entered into.

Month one of “the year of the vegan”

News outlets are abuzz with the promise of new vegan products, celebs, and services and how that is somehow a fresh affirmation that our world is one turn closer to being fully free from animal use.

What About: “No-Kill” Eggs?

The reason for these advancements is not a sense of justice – because that can only mean going vegan – but is primarily driven by economics.

Vegandale Brewery offers the ultimate vegan night out

This brewpub helps veganism shed its stay-home-and-eat-tofu stereotype.

Don’t blame vegans for the shame you feel about using animals

The shame Carly Lewis claims veganism casts over her is more likely the ghosts of moral uncertainty, spectres that are more likely fish than cows, wondering how morality can possibly be used as ammunition in favour of murder.