Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

“Eco Friendly” Meat Guides are just plain silly

Like us on Facebook:

It’s time for your mid-morning eye roll, readers. The Guardian represents the groups of liberal meat eaters who pretend to care about hot button issues but just really want their steaks this week as they published the “Eco Guide to Eating Meat.” It’s become a standard piece now, perhaps a rite of passage, for all major publications to put out articles about how you can slaughter animals while being eco friendly as animal exploitation industries find themselves in the beginning stages of a very welcome breakdown.

By 2050, experts predict, the demand for meat will have doubled,” reports The Guardian,  “and meat-related emissions will boom at 12bn tonnes of carbon to feed a population of 9 billion. Our consumption has to tail off if we are to achieve Paris emissions goals.” Obviously, some bad shit is going down, and they’re smart enough to know this. Of course, they go on to say that “In 2013 researchers found the carbon footprint of a vegetarian to be half of that of a meat eater. Comfortingly, they also found that a flexitarian approach is a close second.” Comfortingly! Of course! Coddling carnists to make them feel better is so very typical. Why go for the close second when you can go all the way? They provide another handy link to an equally baffling article that contends that the meat free lifestyle is snooty and of little effect.

See, this is why I have trust issues when I meet those who are vegan for environmental reasons only, and tell me they personally find no objection to “humanely” killed animals: so long as it is eco-friendly, plenty of people are perfectly okay with consuming and exploiting innocent lives.

Like us on Facebook:

Beyoncé and Jay-Z sell out veganism for ticket giveaway

Veganism deserves better than constantly being considered something to be bribed, dared or loosely entered into.

Month one of “the year of the vegan”

News outlets are abuzz with the promise of new vegan products, celebs, and services and how that is somehow a fresh affirmation that our world is one turn closer to being fully free from animal use.

What About: “No-Kill” Eggs?

The reason for these advancements is not a sense of justice – because that can only mean going vegan – but is primarily driven by economics.

Vegandale Brewery offers the ultimate vegan night out

This brewpub helps veganism shed its stay-home-and-eat-tofu stereotype.

Don’t blame vegans for the shame you feel about using animals

The shame Carly Lewis claims veganism casts over her is more likely the ghosts of moral uncertainty, spectres that are more likely fish than cows, wondering how morality can possibly be used as ammunition in favour of murder.