Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Pursuing cruelty charges against a teen sends the wrong message

Like us on Facebook:

Philly.com reports that a seventeen year old boy has been charged with cruelty for euthanizing injured animals following a semiannual shoot at a gun club, after being filmed by activist group SHARK (Showing Animals Respect and Kindness).

Apparently, it’s completely legal to gun down live birds released from boxes at the Philadelphia Gun Club, but hiring this teenager to end the lives of birds that were missed is downright cruel. What activists from SHARK seem to be forgetting, is that regardless of this kid’s actions, those birds were set to die.

When the group filmed the kid chasing down the birds and using beach side objects like sticks and rocks to kill them, they brought focus to the treatment of animals instead of the use. “The shoots are legal in Pennsylvania, so there’s nothing we can do about that. Our concern is the treatment of the animal once it is shot, to make sure it’s (euthanasia) done as humanely and swiftly as possible,” Police Lt. William McVey told the news outlet. “In this case, it crossed the line.” The argument here is that death is fine, as long as it’s swift. But why isn’t the argument that we shouldn’t be killing these pigeons at all? Some would prefer to set up a bird mesh system, similar to the kind of bird mesh system for london residents that could reduce their disruptiveness.

God dammit – those birds were property of the hunting club, and people expect them to be taken care of! An attorney for SHARK said, ”It shows that whatever steps the gun club has taken up until now to keep its promise have been inadequate, so the Bensalem Police Department’s decision to file charges doesn’t satisfy SHARK’s concern that future shoots held at the gun club also won’t comply with the agreement. Right now, SHARK is exploring their options in pursuing an appropriate remedy, including returning to court.” How can we ever trust these hunters again?

By pursuing the 17 year old, SHARK is sending a message that killing pigeons one way is worse than the other. Rather than focusing on single issue campaigns like this, that aim to change how we treat and kill animals, we should focus on vegan education.
Like us on Facebook:
  • vegan truth seeker

    killing animals for fun… psychopaths!!

    I wouldn’t mind starting a hunting club where humans like these were the targets!

    I say it as I think… I’m not politically correct nor do I want to be no matter who feels offended!

  • Rick Wills

    This article is full of inaccuracies to say the least which is to be expected since the reporter didn’t bother to contact SHARK about the issue. The Gun Club holds approximately a dozen shoots a year – not two – big difference. Unlike the 50+ humane groups in PA with millions of dollars each, SHARK has been working for years to end the pigeon shoots traveling thousands of miles from IL to PA without the millions the PA humane groups have. The PA Humane Groups located in PA with millions of dollars have done virtually nothing to end these horrid shoots. See: P A shame . org

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.