Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Morrissey: Fundamental Rights or a Chevrolet Volt?

Like us on Facebook:

So last year you may remember that Morrissey was interviewed by Larry King, where he effectively denigrated veganism to being nothing more than a “purist” personal choice. Despite it being over 30 years since the release of The Smith’s “Meat is Murder” record, Morrissey has only in the last year decided to stop exploiting animals himself through embracing veganism – and boy did he make a meal out of it. You might recall such breathtaking comments as, “everybody begins as a vegetarian because to dive straight forward into being completely purist is very hard for most people.” That’s right, just like how it’s “very hard” to respect the fundamental rights of humans – damn those purists saying that we shouldn’t be racist or sexist. Don’t they realise how hard it is not to rape or racially abuse someone? Morrissey clearly has no concept of fundamental rights with respect to animals, and so does nothing but perpetuate the speciesism that enables us to exploit them in the first place with his pejorative denigration of veganism as “purist.” Yes, Morrissey, I am a purist with respect to fundamental animal rights, just like i’m a “purist” with respect to the fundamental rights women have to bodily integrity. Why? Because to not be a “purist” with such matters is fucked up. It accepts the faux-legitimacy of that unjust exploitation.

If this isn’t jogging your memory of the Larry King show yet, Morrissey also said that financially it’s hard for people to be vegan, and that it’s difficult to find food. Apparently Morrissey is unaware of the fact that if you want to be a healthy vegan, it’s incredibly cheap and easy. All you need – vegetables, fruits, nuts, whole grains, legumes, and seeds – can be found at your local supermarket or grocery store. If, however, like Morrissey, you’re more interested in purchasing exotic vegan footwear for hundreds of dollars a pair, things might get pricey. Or perhaps more recently, if you’re like Morrissey and fancy a brand new 2017 Chevrolet Volt, write a letter to the CEO of General Motors asking for vegan leather to be made available on order. This is his latest foray into “animal advocacy” on behalf of PETA. Was his main concern the unjust use of animals as our resources? Our denial of their most fundamental rights as sentient beings via treating them as our property?

Of course not. He wrote about entirely humanocentric concerns – the greenhouse gas emissions caused by animal agriculture; the toxic chemicals that animal skins are treated with that “poison vital waterways.” This was all in aid of a PETA’ “investigation” on a Brazilian leather ranch that just so happens to supply GM, Toyota, and Volkswagen with hides for their car interiors. Morrissey supposedly refers to this PETA “investigation” in his letter, where the outcome of the “investigation” is that the cattle there are “treated inhumanely.”

I have news for you, Morrissey. All animal use is “inhumane.” So long as animals are our property, humans will be able to inflict “necessary” suffering on them wherever there is a benefit to be made, a routine practice to be honoured, or a profit to be sought. The only limit to how “inhumane” we can be is the imagination of animal property owners in deciding what needs to be done to their animal property in order to facilitate their use or render that property fit for human purposes. The law protects the interests of property owners, not the property.

All you are doing, Morrissey, is perpetuating animal exploitation by making people think that there is a moral difference between the leather produced on the farms PETA investigated, and the leather farms that were not investigated. You are making people think that there is a moral difference between leather and other animal products. By telling people that our primary concern should be that cows are treated “inhumanely” (which is a meaningless phrase given that there is no use that isn’t “inhumane” from the animals point of view), you are reaffirming in peoples minds the false idea that it’s only our treatment of animals that matters, and not their use.

For Morrissey, veganism isn’t a basic principle of justice – it’s pleather seats on a new Chevy, unnecessary processed food, and expensive shoes. In reality, veganism represents a basic principle of justice in recognition of the moral value of animals. We need to stop portraying it as something that is only for the hardcore “animal people” who spend years on a “journey” getting there. It’s people like Morrissey who make people say things like “veganism isn’t for me.” Veganism is for everyone who takes animal interests seriously – we just have to bring them to that rational conclusion.

Photo from The Jakarta Post

Like us on Facebook:
  • oliver

    I think you misinterpret Morrissey’s use of ‘purist.’ It’s not pejorative and it *is* hard to be vegan when you start out. I didn’t realise the origins of L-Cysteine for example. I didn’t realise that the D3 added to corn flakes is derived from animals. The list is massive and never ending.

    You shouldn’t criticize someone for not doing *everything* you want when they are at least doing *something* – Morrissey (and Johnny Marr) have influenced untold numbers of people to not eat meat and because it took someone longer to get there than someone else is not a stick to beat them with.

    There are so many better targets for your writing than Morrissey.

  • daniel

    Cool, let’s waste our time and energy criticizing other vegetarians rather than the other 98% of the population

  • Alister Moore

    in 2016, animals are STILL being treated in the most horrific ways. Even the Bank Of England couldn’t produce a Five Pound Note without it containing animal fat. Modern celebs like David Beckham and Guy Ritchie continue to continue the “Old ways” and shot birds for fun..Just like the good old British Royal Family. Road side zoos in America keep animals in appalling conditions.Thousands of dogs were killed and eaten at a Chinese festival. Social media is packed with evidence off people attacking pets – just today some wretched posted about killing the next door neighbours cat. Just last week a guy was filmed kicking his dog in the head on a train.

    With all this in mind, why attack someone who has used his fame to promote animal rights for around 30 years?
    The answer, of course, is simple the article is just bitter puking from someone who throws childish attacks, while pretending they are unmasking valid character issues.
    This reeks of someone trying to make their name on the back of someone else, i think modern people call it “Trolling” , the rest of call it being a cretin
    People find their way, when they find their way in their own time…Yes it took him a while to be vegan BUT so what? He was a vegetarian for years, he has possibly helped turn tens of thousands against the meat industry. Its not an egg and spoon race.. He’s defiantly done his bit and is STILL doing his bit..Better than simply writing a book which only the already interested will read. Certainly better than attacking other animal rights activists on some blog or other.

    Do you really think a person is more moral SIMPLY because they are a vegan rather than a vegetarian or EVEN Vegetarian over a meat eater?

    Life isn’t that simple I can tell you of lots of animal rights people who are merely egotists, fashion dieters who have nought moral fibber.
    For large swaths “Ethical” living IS the new snobbery.

    Its interesting that the writers hunger for attack, completely twists and misunderstands that which the singer was saying on The Larry King Show, not to mention failing to mention the importance (for many) of the song Meat Is Murder, The fact Morrissey has banned venues (and friends) from serving meat when he plays or that he often, privately and publicly, writes to various businesses and people to push animal rights.

    I’ve just peeped at a picture of the writer, looking like Worzel Gummidge , with his acoustic guitar singing into the mic , the motivation for this attack is all too clear. Jealousy aimed to spite.

    So much for the “Enlightenment”

  • Kenneth G. Stavitzke

    Ironically, Frost’s text is humanocentric itself. This article is poor news and simply trashy, catty, and campy. Frost fails to address capitalism/consumerism as the real evil in today’s world. Instead, he attacks Morrissey. This article was written by a bitter queen who is clueless. The only hope for our world is a revolutionary form of matrifocality, and Frost apparently doesn’t understand this.

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.