Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Ugh, the ‘plants have feelings’ argument is back

Like us on Facebook:

In a stunning piece of journalism from Metro, vegans should just give up already because plants can hear themselves being eaten. Forget the whole not having a central nervous system, they have ears!

Pointing to nothing more than “ecologically relevant vibration” that researchers at the University of Missouri are testing out, they surmise that anyone forgoing animal products should go ahead and start back on a plate of ribs since we’re all murderers anyway. It’s basically every non-vegans dream come true that new research will prove vegans to be truly evil, right?

The unsourced study is monitoring what happens when caterpillars are placed on Arabidopsis – a weed from Eurasia. It’s said to be a relative of cabbage or mustard, and is basically what everyone knows to be the backbone of a vegan diet (not).

They claim that as the caterpillars munch away, the plant releases chemicals to fend them off. Is that morally valuable enough to make us forget what an animal does when someone tries to munch on him or her?

The plants have feelings argument will never succeed, as it attempts to remove our obligation to animals from the picture. And with farmed animals eating more plants than human beings, it’d still be more valuable for these poor, unfortunate plants to have a world of vegans. 

It’s just another round of Metro branded sensationalism that looks to capitalize on the clickbait of putting “sorry vegans” in a title. It’s our moral obligation to animals to go vegan.

Like us on Facebook:

France’s ban of faux-meat branding won’t stop veganism

I’ll take “mycoproteinous food tube” over a tube of dead pig any day.

Concerned about endangered animals? Stop eating them

Methods of animal conservation that support the exploitation of animals don’t exist for the animals, they exist for human profit.

What you can do if live exports disturb you

The outcry should go further than importation and should be directed at the fact that the animals in question were on their way to slaughter in the first place.